Posts Tagged ‘drunk driving’


Section 23152 Driving Under Influence of Alcohol or Drugs

Sunday, July 22nd, 2012

Driving Under Influence of Alcohol or Drugs

23152.  (a) It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage and drug, to drive a vehicle.

(b) It is unlawful for any person who has 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a vehicle.

For purposes of this article and Section 34501.16, percent, by weight, of alcohol in a person’s blood is based upon grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.

In any prosecution under this subdivision, it is a rebuttable presumption that the person had 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of driving the vehicle if the person had 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of the performance of a chemical test within three hours after the driving.

(c) It is unlawful for any person who is addicted to the use of any drug to drive a vehicle. This subdivision shall not apply to a person who is participating in a narcotic treatment program approved pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 11875) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 10.5 of the Health and Safety Code.

(d) It is unlawful for any person who has 0.04 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in Section 15210.

In any prosecution under this subdivision, it is a rebuttable presumption that the person had 0.04 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of driving the vehicle if the person had 0.04 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of the performance of a chemical test within three hours after the driving.

(e) This section shall become operative on January 1, 1992, and shall remain operative until the director determines that federal regulations adopted pursuant to the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 (49 U.S.C. Sec. 2701 et seq.) contained in Section 383.51 or 391.15 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations do not require the state to prohibit operation of commercial vehicles when the operator has a concentration of alcohol in his or her blood of 0.04 percent by weight or more.

(f) The director shall submit a notice of the determination under subdivision (e) to the Secretary of State, and this section shall be repealed upon the receipt of that notice by the Secretary of State.

Repealed Ch. 708, Stats. 1990. Effective January 1, 1991. Operative January 1, 1992.
Amended Ch. 974, Stats. 1992. Effective September 28, 1992.
Amended Sec. 31, Ch. 455, Stats. 1995. Effective September 5, 1995.

NOTE: This section remains in effect only until notice by the Secretary of State, at which time it is repealed and the following section becomes effective.

 23152  (a) It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic beverage and drug, to drive a vehicle..

(b) It is unlawful for any person who has 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a vehicle.

For purposes of this article and Section 34501.16, percent, by weight, of alcohol in a person’s blood is based upon grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.

In any prosecution under this subdivision, it is a rebuttable presumption that the person had 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of driving the vehicle if the person had 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at the time of the performance of a chemical test within three hours after the driving.

(c) It is unlawful for any person who is addicted to the use of any drug to drive a vehicle. This subdivision shall not apply to a person who is participating in a narcotic treatment program approved pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 11875) of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 10.5 of the Health and Safety Code.

(d) This section shall become operative only upon the receipt by the Secretary of State of the notice specified in subdivision (f) of Section 23152, as added by Section 25 of Chapter 1114 of the Statutes of 1989.

Amended Ch. 708, Stats. 1990. Effective January 1, 1991.
Amended Ch. 974, Stats. 1992. Effective September 28, 1992.
Amended Sec. 32, Ch. 455, Stats. 1995. Effective September 5, 1995.

Drunk Driving Defense Specialist

Saturday, July 7th, 2012

Drunk Driving Defense Specialist

DUI Attorney J.K. Moran is a former prosecutor, he served as City Attorney of the cities of Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage.

After leaving the prosecutor’s office, Mr. Moran has maintained a thriving DUI defense practice since 1982 at the same convenient downtown Palm Springs location. In fact, Mr. Moran is the “Desert’s DUI Specialist.

Do I really need a DUI Lawyer? – Yes! Call now and have your questions answered.

The best DUI  Attorney in Coachella Valley

Serving Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, La Quinta, Indio, Yucca Valley, 29 Palms, Coachella Valley, Riverside and San Bernardino.

Moran Law Firm

777 Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 200-75
Palm Springs,
California
92261

Phone: (760) 778-7777
URL of Map

 

Palm Desert, CA. – DUI Attorney

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2012

DUI Attorney, drunk driving defense specialist, J.K. Moran

Moran Law Firm is located at 777 Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 200-75, Palm Springs, CA. 92262

(760) 778-7777

Serving the community of Palm Desert, California

View Larger Map

DUI Attorney, Palm Springs, CA.

Sunday, June 24th, 2012

DUI Attorney

 

J.K. Moran

777 Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 200-75

Palm Springs, CA. 92262

(760) 778-7777

 

J.K. Moran serving Riverside, San Bernardino, Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, La Quinta, Indio, 29 Palms, Yucca Valley, Coachella Valley

JK Moran DUI Attorney – Case Study

Sunday, June 10th, 2012

JK Moran DUI Attorney – Case Study

 

           Blood Alcohol Content (BAC): .19%

 

  • Details: Driver was weaving in and out of his lane at approximately 10:00 p. m. in Palm Springs. Within seconds of arriving at his home he was contacted by a police officer who had followed him home. The officer alleged that the client admitted to drinking up to eight beers and felt the effects of the drinks.

 

  • According to the police report, the driver was weaving, admitted to drinking up to 8 beers, said  “I felt the effects of the drinks.”  The jury found this driver not guilty.

 

  • Location: Palm Springs

 

Moran Law Firm - JK Moran - DUI, DWI attorney

J.K. Moran

DUI Attorney – DWI Attorny

J.K. Moran

 

Drunk Driving Defense Specialist

Moran Law Firm

(760) 778-7777 – attorneyjkmoran@gmail.com

serving Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral City, Indio, Rancho Mirage, 29 Palms, Yucca Valley, Riverside County, Coachella Valley